close
請幫我比較各家銀行的利率和過件率
這裡可以免費比較諮詢:https://goo.gl/GHgNa2
“However, if the高雄貸款公司 videos are merely short film synopses, it will be harder for the YouTuber to claim fair use,” Chang said.
AmoGood （谷阿莫）, a Taiwanese YouTuber known for his irreverent movie reviews, has個人信貸記錄 found himself in a legal battle after being sued for copyright infringement.
新聞來源：TAIPEI TIMES
AmoGood, whose YouTube channel has more than 987,000 subscribers, produces short videos using scenes from films while he sums up the plot, often in a負債整合利率n軍公教貸款2017 offbeat and irre創業貸款利率verent manner.
Chang Chung-hsin （章忠信）, a academic who specializes in intellectual property law, said that if AmoGood’s short videos are intended to mock and ridicule the original film, then he has a better chance of arguing that his videos are in line with Article 52 of the Copyright Act （著作權法）, which stipulates that, within a reasonable scope, works can be quoted where necessary for comment or other legitimate purposes.
AmoGood on Monday defended his videos online, saying that he believes they do not violate the princi高雄民間代書貸款ple of fair use under copyright law, which allows people to use copyrighted materials for commentary, research, news reporting and other purposes without having to obtain permission from the copyright holder.
借錢救急管道急需錢怎麼辦2017-04-2603:00
Yang declined to comment on the amount of damages sought, saying that the case has entered judicial proceedings.
Autoai Design said AmoGood has used images from at least four films that it has distributed and 原住民貸款買房has affected the films box office receipts by making them “sound boring.”缺錢急用個人信用小額借貸
COMIC RELIEF AmoGood’s parodic movie reviews are often offbeat and irreverent critiques. However, two firms see nothing funny about them, claiming they lost revenue
KKTV executive Yang Chih-kuang （楊志光） yesterday accused AmoGood of reproducing and spreading unauthorized content and for failing to give attribution when using images from the South Korean TV series W, which it distributed in Taiwan.
The Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office yesterda原住民貸款條件y哪間銀行信貸比較好過 said that it has started an inv個人貸款利率estigation and that police searched AmoGood’s company on Wednesday.
Video streaming platform KKTV Co and film company Autoai Design on Monday said that they are suing AmoGood for infringing on their intellectual property rights by using images from their films without notifying them in advance.
AmoGood has knowingly sp勞工紓困貸款2017read unauthorized content on YouTube, Facebook, Weibo and other online platforms, Yang said.
/ Staff writer, with CNA
E9C2105A1D95038F
文章標籤
全站熱搜
留言列表
